JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 7, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Danil Roman Velandia Rojas Y Otro

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica instaurado en contra del auto proferido por la Magistrada Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado, mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia, por la falta de claridad, certeza y pertinencia y a la existencia del fenómeno de la cosa juzgada en relación con la sentencia C-126/95, que declaró exequible la disposición acusada.

Luego de analizar el escrito de súplica, la Sala Plena decide CONFIRMAR el auto recurrido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. CONFIRMAR el auto del 26 de febrero de 2015, proferido por la magistrada Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado dentro del expediente D-10614, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por los ciudadanos Danil Roman Velandia Rojas y Libny Ospina en contra del inciso
  2. primero. (parcial) del articulo 36 de la Ley 100 de 1993..
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.